Prosecutors in Maria Butina case complain about her attorney’s media appearances


Federal prosecutors in the case against alleged Russian agent Maria Butina complained to a judge Wednesday about media appearances by Butina’s attorney, and said they would not provide evidence to the defense until a protective order was in place.

No trial date was set Wednesday for Butina, who has been held without bond since her arrest July 15.

Her lawyer, Robert N. Driscoll, said Wednesday he would be seeking a new hearing to have Butina released from jail pending trial. Prosecutors argued Butina was a flight risk saying she was arrested in an apartment filled with packed boxes indicating her intent to leave Washington, and that she could enter a Russian embassy or diplomatic vehicle and evade prosecution indefinitely.

Butina, 29, is charged with conspiring with Russian officials to act as an agent of a foreign government and also with failing to register as a foreign agent.

The officials are not named in the indictment, but Butina was often seen accompanying Russian central banker Alexander Torshin to meetings of the National Rifle Association and other political events in the U.S. A long series of emails between Butina and a mentor in Russia cited in filings appears to involve Torshin.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas N. Saunders told U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan Wednesday that the government wanted to provide Driscoll with pre-trial discovery immediately, initially comprising about 1.5 million files. But prosecutors want restrictions on how Driscoll can use or disclose some of that information, and Saunders said Driscoll rejected any constraints.

The judge gave the prosecution until August 8 to file a proposed protective order, and Driscoll a week after that for his response.

Driscoll entered a plea of not guilty for Butina at her arraignment last week where she was ordered detained. He said she was in Washington to obtain a master’s degree from American University, which she did in May, and to network with American politicians and groups.

[Before her arrest as an alleged Russian agent, Maria Butina’s proud defense of her homeland drew notice at American University]

In asking to limit public comments, Saunders noted Driscoll had made several appearances on television news shows to defend Butina, and claimed that he “repeatedly violated the local rule” at court governing attorneys’ public comments about a case. Saunders quoted a Driscoll appearance on CNN in which the attorney said, “I think most of the case is taken completely out of context.”

Chutkan noted “there is a line between defending your client and violating the local rule.” Saunders argued that Driscoll “can’t mischaracterize the case.”

The judge turned to Driscoll and asked, “Do you think it’s in your client’s interest to have this case tried in the press?”

Driscoll said he wasn’t trying the case, but “Ms. Butina is the subject of national incorrect media reporting that I’m trying to push back on.” He said prosecutors have alleged Butina offered sex in exchange for a job, and are “refusing to provide evidence for that.”

Driscoll added, “I think I’ve got to zealously represent her. The appearances I’ve done are an eye dropper in a negative tsunami that’s already convicted her.”

After the hearing, Driscoll appeared momentarily in front of a clutch of cameras and microphones to say only that he was “confident that Ms. Butina will be vindicated at the end of this process.”

[Alleged Russian agent Maria Butina ordered to remain in custody after prosecutors argue she has ties to Russian intelligence]

A man cited in court documents as Butina’s “funder” after she moved to the U.S. on a student visa in 2016 was identified by The Post this week as Russian billionaire Konstantin Nikolaev.

Butina launched a gun rights group in Russia in 2012 and told the Senate Intelligence Committee that Nikolaev provided funding for that group. A spokesman for Nikolaev declined to confirm whether he gave her financial support. Prosecutors described the “funder” as “a known Russian businessman with deep ties to the Russian Presidential Administration.”

Butina also is allegedly connected to Russian intelligence officials. Prosecutors said in one court filing that she had contact information for several Russian FSB employees, the Russian internal security agency, and she was photographed in March dining with a Russian diplomat suspected of being an intelligence officer shortly before he was expelled from the country.

[‘She was like a novelty’: How alleged Russian agent Maria Butina gained access to elite conservative circles]

Federal prosecutors appear interested in determining whether Butina helped funnel money into American elections, possibly through the NRA, although the case is being handled by national security prosecutors and not special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s team. Driscoll, said she had been contacted by the Federal Election Commission in March regarding campaign contributions, and provided 8,000 pages of documents to the Senate Intelligence Committee in April. Senate Democrats have pushed the NRA unsuccessfully for information on how they received and used Russian financial contributions.

[Guns and religion: How American conservatives grew closer to Putin’s Russia]

Butina has said that she became friendly with the NRA because of a shared interest in gun rights, and she and Torshin hosted a group of American gun enthusiasts in Moscow in 2013. But she said her group, “Right to Bear Arms,” was “not very popular” with Russian officials, according to an email she sent The Post last year. “No government official has EVER approached me about ‘fostering ties’ with any Americans,” she wrote.

Rosalind S. Helderman contributed to this report.

Source of this (above) article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/prosecutors-in-maria-butina-case-complain-about-her-attorneys-media-appearances/2018/07/25/76ee6dc8-8f72-11e8-bcd5-9d911c784c38_story.html

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *